- users@lists.openpreservation.org - Open Preservation Foundation mailing lists.

[veraPDF-users] How veraPDF performs XMP packets validation?
by Francesco Pretto 10 Jun '22

10 Jun '22

Hello veraPDF users/devs, I have a question over XMP packets validation in PDF documents: how does veraPDF actually does it? Can you point me to references in the code where this is performed? I elaborate more on the question, providing a viable solution as suggested by ISO standards committee. I have access to both ISO 16684-1:2019[1] and ISO 16684-2:2014[2]: the first standard generically describes the XMP packets data model and properties, explaining the many alternative notations accepted (that make difficult to validate the packets). The second suggests a method for the normalization of the packets to create an unique representation of the information stored in the packets (this method can be mostly implemented without knowing anything about the actual XMP data model/properties). It then supplies some sample RELAX NG schemas to validate unspecified XMP demo packets. These schemas clearly aren't describing the full schema to validate the XMP packets of PDF documents since all pdf specific properties are missing but also some generic ones. If the full schema to validate XMP packets in PDF documents was publicly available, validate the XMP packets in PDF documents would be quite simple as the normalization algorithm is not very difficult to implement. I asked for it in[3] but I doubt Adobe will release it. It may also not exist at all since 16684-2:2014 recommendations may have been developed independently from use in any actual Adobe product. Thank you in advance for any insight. Regards, Francesco [1] https://www.iso.org/standard/75163.html [2] https://www.iso.org/standard/57422.html [3] https://github.com/adobe/xmp-docs/issues/20

2 2

[veraPDF-users] veraPDF 1.14 onwards accepts file as PDF/A-1b compliant despite violation of clause 6.1.12 (floating-point range of ±32767.0)?
by Thomas Fischer 14 Apr '22

14 Apr '22

Hello, I have a PDF document that, depending on veraPDF version, either passes or fails conformance checks for PDF/A-1b. The file is publicly available being a doctoral dissertation: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A280958&dswid=836 http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:280958/FULLTEXT02.pdf With veraPDF 1.14.8 and later, this file passes the conformance check for PDF/A-1b, but it fails with veraPDF 1.12.1 and earlier with the following error message: <validationReport profileName="PDF/A-1B validation profile" statement="PDF file is not compliant with Validation Profile requirements." isCompliant="false"> <details passedRules="102" failedRules="1" passedChecks="65345" failedChecks="1"> <rule specification="ISO 19005-1:2005" clause="6.1.12" testNumber="2" status="failed" passedChecks="0" failedChecks="1"> <description>Absolute real value must be less than or equal to 32767.0</description> <object>CosReal</object> <test>(realValue >= -32767.0) && (realValue <= 32767.0)</test> <check status="failed"> <context>root/document[0]/OpenAction[0](156 0 obj PDGoToAction)/D[0]</context> </check> </rule> </details> </validationReport> Release details for core, validation model and gui are all 1.12.1 In contrast, for example, veraPDF 1.18.6 prints: <report> <buildInformation> <releaseDetails id="core" version="1.18.11" buildDate="2021-04-19T10:21:00+02:00"></releaseDetails> <releaseDetails id="validation-model" version="1.18.8" buildDate="2021-04-19T10:35:00+02:00"></releaseDetails> <releaseDetails id="gui" version="1.18.6" buildDate="2021-04-27T08:53:00+02:00"></releaseDetails> </buildInformation> <jobs> <job> <item size="4458678"> <name>/tmp/pdf/oaiDiVAorguu-111393.pdf</name> </item> <validationReport profileName="PDF/A-1B validation profile" statement="PDF file is compliant with Validation Profile requirements." isCompliant="true"> <details passedRules="101" failedRules="0" passedChecks="65346" failedChecks="0"></details> </validationReport> <duration start="1649428145077" finish="1649428146991">00:00:01.914</duration> </job> </jobs> <batchSummary totalJobs="1" failedToParse="0" encrypted="0"> <validationReports compliant="1" nonCompliant="0" failedJobs="0">1</validationReports> <featureReports failedJobs="0">0</featureReports> <repairReports failedJobs="0">0</repairReports> <duration start="1649428144942" finish="1649428147026">00:00:02.084</duration> </batchSummary> </report> I checked veraPDF-validation-profiles/PDF_A/PDFA-1B.xml and its Git history, but I could not identify any changes to the rules checking floating-point numbers for its range of ±32767 from Table C.1 of Adobe's PDF 1.4 specification. I used qpdf to extract more information on object 156 where I get the following output: $ qpdf --json --json-key=objects FULLTEXT02.pdf | grep -A 5 '"156 0 R": {' "156 0 R": { "/D": [ "158 0 R", "/FitH", -32768 ], So, to my understanding, the numeric value of -32768 is outside of the allowed range and thus veraPDF should reject this PDF file as *not* conforming to PDF/A-1b. Is there a bug in veraPDF or do I miss something? Thank you! Bye, Thomas

2 2

[veraPDF-users] veraPDF 1.20 released
by Charlotte Armstrong 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

Dear all, The Open Preservation Foundation <http://openpreservation.org> is pleased to announce that the veraPDF 1.20 has been released following community testing. veraPDF 1.20 introduces support for PDF/A-4 (ISO 19005-4:2020) including core requirements, Level F (file attachments) and Level E (engineering). It also now supports Java versions from 8 to 16. Download veraPDF 1.20 <https://software.verapdf.org/releases/verapdf-installer.zip> Read the release notes <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/releases/latest> Our thanks go to all contributors and testers, particularly the Dual Lab <http://www.duallab.com/> development team. veraPDF is free to download, use and to modify to meet your needs. However, there are ongoing costs to host and maintain it. If you use veraPDF, please consider supporting its development by becoming an OPF member <https://openpreservation.org/membership>or making a donation <https://openpreservation.org/donate/>. Learn more <https://openpreservation.org/news/verapdf-1-20-released>. Best wishes, Charlotte -- Charlotte Armstrong | Project Officer | Open Preservation Foundation <https://openpreservation.org/> | Twitter: @openpreserve <https://twitter.com/openpreserve> Please note: My OPF working days are Thursday and Friday. Please bear with me if I don't reply to your email right away.

1 0

[veraPDF-users] veraPDF 1.20 release candidate available for community testing
by Charlotte Armstrong 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

Dear all, The Open Preservation Foundation <http://openpreservation.org/> is pleased to announce that the release candidate for veraPDF <https://openpreservation.org/products/verapdf/> 1.20 is out now! This release adds support for PDF/A-4 (ISO 19005-4:2020) including core requirements, Level F (file attachments) and Level E (engineering). It also now supports Java versions from 8 to 16. To learn more about the new fixes and features read the release notes <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/blob/rc/1.20/RELEASENOTES.md>. Download veraPDF 1.20-RC <https://software.verapdf.org/rel/verapdf-installer-rc.zip> We invite you to download and test the release candidate. Please report any bugs on the veraPDF issue tracker on GitHub <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/issues> or contact us <https://openpreservation.org/about/contact> with any feedback or questions. Our thanks go to all contributors, particularly the Dual Lab <http://www.duallab.com/> development team, and the OPF Product Board. Learn more about the release. <https://openpreservation.org/news/verapdf-1-20-release-candidate-available-…> Kind regards, Charlotte -- Charlotte Armstrong | Project Officer | Open Preservation Foundation <https://openpreservation.org/> | Twitter: @openpreserve <https://twitter.com/openpreserve> Please note: My OPF working days are Thursday and Friday. Please bear with me if I don't reply to your email right away.

1 0

[veraPDF-users] Info on Release of verapdf-greenfield-2.0.59-installer.zip
by thirumani t 17 Jun '21

17 Jun '21

Hi Team, We are using the verapdf tool for checking PDFA compliance. Currently we are using version 1.12.1 and that reports the below error. While analyzing we noticed that this error is not being reported in the latest development version 2.0.59. So we are wondering if this is being reported incorrectly in the version 1.12.1 and has been fixed in the latest development version. Can you confirm if that is the case and also let us know if there is any tentative timeline on when you are planning to release the next version and will that be as that of a build after version 2.0.59? 6.2.11.8-1 - A PDF/A-2 compliant document shall not contain a reference to the .notdef glyph from any of the text showing operators, regardless of text rendering mode, in any content stream Thanks & Regards, Thirumani

2 2

[veraPDF-users] Release candidate available for veraPDF 1.18 with PDF/UA support
by Charlotte Armstrong 24 Feb '21

24 Feb '21

Dear All, We are pleased to let you know that veraPDF 1.18.2-RC is now available for community testing. This release includes new PDF/UA-1 (Matterhorn machine) validation, as well as fixes and enhancements of the PDF parser. Learn more in the release notes <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/releases/tag/v1.18.2-RC>. Download veraPDF 1.18.2-RC <https://software.verapdf.org/rel/verapdf-installer-rc.zip> Please report any bugs via the veraPDF issue tracker on GitHub <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/issues> or contact us with any feedback or questions. Internal testing of the release candidate is ongoing and there may be a few small changes before the final production release. ThanksOur thanks go to all contributors, particularly the Dual Lab <http://www.duallab.com/> development team, and the OPF Product Board. Kind Regards, Charlotte -- Charlotte Armstrong | Project Officer | Open Preservation Foundation <https://openpreservation.org/> Twitter: @openpreserve <https://twitter.com/openpreserve> | Skype: charlotte.armstrong_7 Please note: I work at OPF on a part-time basis. Please bear with me if I don't get to your email right away.

1 0

[veraPDF-users] veraPDF 1.16 released
by Charlotte Armstrong 12 May '20

12 May '20

Dear all, We are pleased to announce that veraPDF 1.16 has been released following community testing. The latest version is available to download here <http://downloads.verapdf.org/rel/verapdf-installer.zip>. What’s new? This release includes new features and fixes including: - Added support for Function objects in PDF - Added detection and validation of the XMP encoding - Extended veraPDF model to include structure tree - More robust PDF parsing in case of critical low-level syntax errors - Optimized memory usage for more efficient batch processing with a large number of validation errors - GUI application improvements Future development We are excited to inform users that we are now working towards PDF/UA validation, with added support for tagging structure of PDF. Find out more in the release notes <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/releases/latest>. Feedback welcome If you’d like to make a feature request or report a bug, add it to the veraPDF issue tracker on GitHub <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/issues> or contact us <https://openpreservation.org/about/contact> with any comments. Thanks Our thanks go to all the contributors, particularly the Dual Lab <http://www.duallab.com/> Development Team and the OPF Product Board for their ongoing input and support. About veraPDF veraPDF is the first complete, open source PDF/A validator. The software is sustained and maintained by the Open Preservation Foundation <https://openpreservation.org/>. Dual Lab <http://www.duallab.com/> provides active user support and carries out maintenance and bug fixes. The PDF Association’s <https://www.pdfa.org/> PDF Validation Technical Working Group continues in its role resolving ambiguities arising from veraPDF’s usage in the field, and promoting the adoption of PDF/A and veraPDF by developers worldwide. veraPDF is open source, free to download, to use and to modify. However, it is not free to host, maintain, support or develop. veraPDF is a widely-used digital preservation tool, but currently, only OPF members support veraPDF financially as part of their membership fees. If you use veraPDF, please consider supporting its development by becoming an OPF member <https://openpreservation.org/membership>or making a donation <https://openpreservation.org/donate/> towards development. Kind regards, Charlotte -- Charlotte Armstrong | Project Officer | Open Preservation Foundation <https://openpreservation.org/> Twitter: @openpreserve <https://twitter.com/openpreserve> | Skype: charlotte.armstrong_7

1 0

[veraPDF-users] PDF/A-1b-validation - Vera visavi PDFTools
by Bo Öberg 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

Hi, We have a situation where a PDF/A-1b generated by PDFTools fails in VeraPDF validation. We need to find the problem to be able to use VeraPDF as a trustworthy validator! The VeraPDF "ValidationResult" is as follows: ValidationResult [flavour=1b, totalAssertions=6096003, assertions=[TestAssertion [ruleId=RuleId [specification=ISO 19005-1:2005, clause=6.2.3, testNumber=4], status=failed, message=If an uncalibrated colour space is used in a file then that file shall contain a PDF/A-1 OutputIntent, as defined in 6.2.2, location=Location [level=CosDocument, context=root/document[0]/pages[234](256 0 obj PDPage)/contentStream[0](4695 0 obj PDContentStream)/operators[1040]/xObject[0](4696 0 obj PDXForm)/contentStream[0](4696 0 obj PDContentStream)/operators[6137]/fillCS[0](1157 0 obj PDTilingPattern)/contentStream[0](1157 0 obj PDContentStream)/operators[15]/strokeCS[0]]]], isCompliant=false] The response from PDFTools on looking at the generated document and the Vera-response is as follows: "I can reproduce the behavior and have analyzed the exact error message returned by veraPDF. I can confirm, that the message is not correct. veraPDF complains, that "an uncalibrated colour space is used". However, the respective tiling pattern is an uncolored pattern, so it does not define any colors. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat (Preflight - my note) also validates the file successfully." Can any one tip me how to proceed? Is the response from PDFTools valid? In that case, how to fix VERA validation? We are using jar-files from Vera of version 1.14.105 (except for pdf-model-parser 1.14.103 and parser-1.14.104). I also include the actual pdf-file and the docx source file. Sincerely, Bosse

2 1

[veraPDF-users] veraPDF 1.16 release candidate out now
by Becky McGuinness 20 Feb '20

20 Feb '20

Dear All, We are pleased to announce that the first veraPDF 1.16 release candidate is now available for community testing. Download the release candidate here <https://software.verapdf.org/develop/verapdf-installer-rc.zip>. This release includes new features and fixes including: - Added support for Function objects in PDF - Added detection and validation of the XMP encoding - Extended veraPDF model to include structure tree - More robust PDF parsing in case of critical low-level syntax errors - Optimized memory usage for more efficient batch processing with a large number of validation errors - GUI application improvements We are also working towards PDF/UA validation, with added support for tagging structure of PDF. Read the draft release notes <https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-library/releases/tag/v1.16.0-RC1> for more information. There are still some spaces available for our webinar <https://openpreservation.org/event/whats-new-in-verapdf-1-16/> this afternoon to find out more about the new release. Kind Regards, Becky -- Becky McGuinness | Community Manager @openpreserve | Skype: becky.mcguinness1 *Open Preservation Foundation* *http://openpreservation.org/ <http://openpreservation.org/>* To find out more about becoming a member of the OPF visit: https://openpreservation.org/join/

1 0

[veraPDF-users] Rest API does not build
by Jochen Stärk 11 Nov '19

11 Nov '19

Hi, mvn clean package in the integration branch of a https://github.com/veraPDF/veraPDF-rest checkout returns [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project verapdf-rest: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.verapdf:verapdf-rest:jar:0.1.0-SNAPSHOT: Failed to collect dependencies at org.verapdf:validation-model:jar:1.14.100 -> org.verapdf:core:jar:1.14.2: Failed to read artifact descriptor for org.verapdf:core:jar:1.14.2: Could not transfer artifact org.verapdf:core:pom:1.14.2 from/to vera-pdfbox (http://artifactory.opf-labs.org/artifactory/vera-pdfbox-local): sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target -> [Help 1] Am I doing anything wrong? -- mit freundlichen Grüßen Jochen Stärk www.usegroup.de Huswertstraße 14 60435 Frankfurt Tel: (069)569940-20 Fax: (069)569940-19 Mobil: (0177)4512645

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

users